Vapors

June 15, 2012 - 1:24 pm
Irradiated by LabRat
11 Comments

So it seems recently a Michigan representative got thrown off the floor for using language too salty for the sensibilities of the House.

The offending word was “vagina”. No, seriously. The one that gets, like, a couple of titters when it’s used in health class in front of schoolchildren. The actual anatomical term for that part of a woman’s reproductive anatomy that is surrounded by the vulva and terminates at the cervix, through which penises and semen enter and babies exit some time later. This is not a slangy nickname, let alone an offensive slangy nickname like “cunt” or “gash”, it’s the actual proper term for the body part.

The context for this entire episode was a speech given by Rep. Lisa Brown in opposition to a proposed bill that would, among other things, ban all abortions after 20 weeks. In the course of a longer speech pointing out among other things that anyone who would institute a flat ban on abortions after 20 weeks has not really thought through some of the medical realities of pregnancy, she concluded:

And finally, Mr. Speaker, I’m flattered that you’re all so interested in my vagina, but ‘no’ means ‘no.’

OK. Unquestionably a barb, a goad if you will, perhaps even an insult that might not have been appropriate*, but politics isn’t a tea ceremony. There are rough edges and thrown elbows and in days of yore the occasional savage beatdown. The roughness and occasional crudeness of politics was in fact advanced in days gone by as an argument for why women shouldn’t be allowed to participate, and not in the sense that they were going to frighten the men.

Lest you think I’m exaggerating and she was just thrown off for some sort of “no directly insulting the Speaker, also shut up my god you’re annoying” reason, here is a quote from one of the other representatives:

“‘What she said was offensive,” said Rep. Mike Callton, R-Nashville. ‘It was so offensive, I don’t even want to say it in front of women. I would not say that in mixed company.’

I see.

A glance at his campaign biography indicates that Mike Callton is married, to a woman, and has children, which means that unless a paternity test is failed somewhere down the road that Mike Callton must have interacted with a vagina at some point after his birth, in front of a woman no less. (This also brings to mind the horrifying question of what Mike thinks an appropriate term for the place he must have put his penis at least once is. My imagination is unhelpfully volunteering “vajajay.”)

His Wikipedia page reveals the rather more mind-bending factoid that Mike Callton has a biology degree, which I have difficulty imagining he obtained without ever learning what the proper anatomical term for the bit of a mammal that leads up to the uterus and opens to the world is.

There is, of course, always the depressing option that he thinks vaginas are inherently dirty things that must never be mentioned even in front of people who have to endure the burden of owning one, of course.

Either way, I feel fairly certain that if he, or any other member of the House, is unable to hear the word “vagina” or contemplate its existence without a fainting couch, they sure as fuck should not be allowed to write legislation affecting them.

*It wins over exactly no opponents but the stripe of pro-lifer who appears to be under the impression that women carry babies around in little suitcases under their dresses and not inside their bodies, which can get pretty full-contact gruesome even when nothing is technically all that wrong and the baby is fine, let alone when it is and it’s not, is pretty irritating.

ETA: Actually, two female representatives were barred from the floor, one of which wasn’t told why. Both women were trying to introduce an amendment to the legislation expanding the proposed new regulations on abortion to vasectomy. If trying to make a point through bill edits and amendments is somehow considered unnecessary roughness in legislature, it must be a very, very new development.

11 Responses to “Vapors”

  1. Free-range Oyster Says:

    Oy veh. I am opposed to abortion, with a few minor caveats such as rape and immediate danger to the mother. A flat, no-exceptions ban and this moron’s response to a gorram medical term both make me want to beat people about the head and shoulders with a heavy object shouting “Stay off my side!”

    And the blithering idiot has a *biology degree* but can’t handle hearing the word vagina? Talk about your higher education bubble!

  2. Kristopher Says:

    20 weeks is the god-botherers’ new goal, since the last time the SCOTUS addressed this, the bar on local regulation was set at 28 weeks.

    They are hoping they can influence the SCOTUS if they can get enough states to infringe on the older decision.

  3. Kristopher Says:

    Free-range oyster:

    This crap is all posing for the newspapers.

    The legislator in question could care less about the word itself. They need an excuse to shut the women in the legislature up so they can’t offer amendments that can give moderates an excuse to not vote in lockstep with the god-bothering crowd.

  4. bluntobject Says:

    This also brings to mind the horrifying question of what Mike thinks an appropriate term for the place he must have put his penis at least once is. My imagination is unhelpfully volunteering “vajajay.”

    I’m thinking something sing-song and meaningless, like “hoo-hah”. Then again, I have a hard time not picturing this critter sitting in a sand-filled grade-school playground, whispering “penis” to himself and giggling like a fool over how transgressive he thinks he’s being.

  5. Erin Palette Says:

    I second the nomination for “hoo-hah,” with a secondary nomination for “lady parts.”

  6. Vertel Says:

    We could go all Victorian and call it The Southern Necessity.

  7. Joe in PNG Says:

    There’s always MXC’s preferred phrase of “mommy region”.

  8. BH Says:

    My vote: ‘Down there’ when speaking with a woman

    OTOH, I wouldn’t be surprised if in his own mind or with other men uses ‘crude’ slang words to refer to female body parts.

    Maybe he just thinks vaginas are sexual and therefore ‘dirty’ and therefore only suitable for male conversation.

  9. Kristopher Says:

    I doubt he is bothered at all.

    It’s all an act.

  10. perlhaqr Says:

    Maybe we should buy her a cane, so she can show him what real Legislative down-n-dirty looks like.

  11. Tam Says:

    Either way, I feel fairly certain that if he, or any other member of the House, is unable to hear the word “vagina” or contemplate its existence without a fainting couch, they sure as fuck should not be allowed to write legislation affecting them.

    So. Much. Win.