In Which I Am A Joiner

January 24, 2011 - 5:24 pm
Irradiated by Stingray
Comments Off

For those who have not heard, TJIC is a Massachusetts blogger. TJIC is something of a wookie-suiter, and is not fond of the po-po, authority in general, or much in the way of government. When Rep. Giffords was shot in Tuscon, TJIC opined “1 down, 534 to go.” After posting this, The Arlington, MA police declared him unsuitable to have 2nd Amendment rights, and ordered him to no longer own guns. No charges have been filed, this is simply “because we said so.”

I am of several minds about this.

First, for such an egregious violation of individual liberty, and such a phenomenal lack of understanding of the enumerated rights in the Bill of Rights, I feel that TJIC is wrong. It is not 534 to go, it is 534 + the entirety of the Arlington, MA police force. Such blatant petty tyranny is intolerable in a society where the right to say distasteful things is first protected among The Things With Which Government Shall Not Fuck. I would, without hyperbole, not shed a single tear if the tin-pot jumped up bully who issued the order for TJIC to turn ‘em in was sodomized to death with a toaster, while the toaster was running, and set to “dark.” I’d in fact consider sending a Thank-You card to the person who performed the act.

Of the shooting of congress-beings in general, I agree, for the most part, with Roberta. It’s rude. Beyond that, I am unruffled. I feel sympathy for Ms. Gifford’s family, and certainly for the family and friends of the other victims. I’d feel sorry for Ms. Gifford’s friends, but she is a congresswoman; I doubt she had any. The House and Senate have, for many years now, done virtually nothing that does not serve to reduce liberty, increase the tax burden on citizens, and at the bare minimum meddle pointlessly in places where no meddling was needed, and all of this for no appreciable benefit, and so I am not upset in the slightest that one was shot. I am upset that the shooter’s aim was bad, and that he did it because he’s bugfuck crazy, rather than a well-reasoned expression of principles, and because, as Ms. X said, it is rude for one individual to determine “This is gonna go my way” in such a manner.

Rather as the petulant lickspittle that ordered TJIC to divest of firearms did.

Beyond this, however, is where I begin to feel conflicted. There is a large dose of “Play stupid games, win stupid prizes” in this situation. As the saying goes, “don’t start nuthin’, won’t be nuthin’.” On the one hand, Travis knew he lived in the Volksrepublic. Saying anti-statist shit in statist-central is a stupid idea. On the other hand, if nobody speaks up, such idiocy goes unchecked, and that is certainly the worse option. On the one hand, if things are that bad (in MA, they certainly and obviously are), GTFO. On the other hand, one should not have to flee, anywhere, in the United States in order to find the liberty guaranteed to us by the Constitution. It is simply necessary that someone must stand up and fight these tin-pot bureaucrats with delusions of mental adequacy. That said, what a fuckin’ dumbass way to pick a fight.

Authoritarian dickwads, such as the needle-peckered Arlington, MA police, very rarely respond well to heated and vitriolic expression, whether correct in premise or not. Running around with a giant “Fuck the Gov’t and Fuck the Po-Po” banner as TJIC essentially often did, does not engender the sort of attitude in one’s philosophical opponent other than “Somebody squish this fuck, please,” which appears to be essentially what happened. I fully support people who want to pick a fight on behalf of liberty where it is clearly being infringed, and I support Travis’ fight to maintain his first and second amendment rights in a part of the US that would probably feel perfectly comfortable issuing him an order that he must provide housing for military staff. Given his history of opinion, however, I hold relatively little hope of success. Much lower hope than the case of Heller or McDonald, which did not begin with the plaintiff screaming “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.” As it turns out, stating it calmly was more effective. You catch more flies with honey, etc.

So there we are. I am appalled at the horrible infraction of Travis’ rights. I am appalled at the horrible infraction of JayG’s, Weerd’s and every other gun owner in MA’s rights. And if anybody in the Massachusetts law enforcement community feels I should no longer be allowed to own weapons, they can lip-strangle my penis-neck.

I am TJIC.

But if you’re gonna throw rocks at a hornet’s nest, at least have the fucking common sense to wear a long-sleeve shirt.

No Responses to “In Which I Am A Joiner”

  1. Jennifer Says:

    This wins. Amen to all of that.

  2. Phelps Says:

    But if you’re gonna throw rocks at a hornet’s nest, at least have the fucking common sense to wear a long-sleeve shirt.

    Agreed. But that goes both ways. When the government tells me to hand over my guns, the only response they will get is molon labe. And that includes the magazines that go with them.

  3. Oatworm Says:

    Massachusetts is so messed up, they wouldn’t just feel comfortable requiring TJIC to quarter soldiers, they’d even let one of their citizens sue a neighboring state in Federal court. Why? Because that would turn their violations up to 11.

  4. Dragon Says:

    This is so full of WIN, its on the verge of going supernova…

    Damn…well said.

  5. Borepatch Says:

    On the one hand, if things are that bad (in MA, they certainly and obviously are), GTFO.

    Yup.

  6. perlhaqr Says:

    The problem with the “GTFO” option is, if you never stop to stand your ground and fight, eventually, you run out of places to run to.

  7. Speakertweaker Says:

    perlhaqr is right, as is Stingray. You shouldn’t have to flee in the US to have the freedom to exercise rights protected by the Bill of Rights. Those rights go everywhere. (Those who throw incorporation will be summarily bitch-slapped. I gives no fuck if SCOTUS has given its holy blessing or not. Rights is rights, and I has dem.)

    I am TJIC.

    tweaker

  8. Eric Says:

    So, is no one worried about the 14th Amendment implications, here? Where was the “Due Process of Law?” That’s how we protect our rights: the DA/City Attorney has to go in front of a Judge and explain how TJIC has forfeited his First and Second Amendment rights. They’ve skipped a step, and the whole lot of them should be in hot water.

    Just because someone has a badge and a gun does NOT mean they get to declare, “Today, your rights ended over there.”

    TJIC’s lawyers should file a motion to have his property immediately returned, as their seizure violated the 14th Amendment. THEN the State can institute whatever legal action they think is appropriate.

    One would expect that to be a “no-brainer.” But apparently that’s the condition of the Po-Po in this instance.

  9. perlhaqr Says:

    Eric: The problem is, as the law is written in MA, someone with a badge and a gun (specifically, the permit issuing sheriff) does get to declare “Today, your rights ended over there.”

    I absolutely 1000% think that “the law is an ass”. But I’m not sure the 14th comes into play because in MA, “due process” is “the Sheriff has an absolute authority to declare you unfit to own firearms”.

    —-

    As for the “GTFO” thing, I was reminded of a conversation I had post-Heller, wherein I asked, innocently, I swear, why if people on the other side of the discussion disliked firearms so much, they didn’t move to a country where they were forbidden or mostly forbidden. I got a lot of “I shouldn’t have to move.”

    I’ve realised that my counterpoint argument is: I can’t move. They’ve got every other first world country. Which means: This badger is cornered. Reach into that hole at your own risk.

  10. Geodkyt Says:

    Perlhaqr,

    My family DID move to get away from this kind of crap — both sides, all branches, from a vairety of nations and eras.

    We moved HERE. Done moving.