Archive for February, 2010

Less Science, More Lit

February 14, 2010 - 5:35 pm Comments Off

….Not something you’ll usually hear me say. But, from an article titled “Romeo and Juliet has led us astray”, the author offers the following:

What if Shakespeare had it wrong about love in “Romeo and Juliet”? In fact, what if all of us have it wrong and our ideals of love and romance are hopelessly awry?……

…We never remember that part of the story, though, because if we think of “Romeo and Juliet” from that perspective, the whole play starts to skew in ways that contradict our usual romantic notions.

Perhaps the time has come for us to take a skeptical view of romance, particularly the over-the-top variety peddled so effectively on Valentine’s Day. We should throw off the shackles of our reigning romantic orthodoxy and realize that “Romeo and Juliet” and its many cultural offspring have led us astray. Shakespeare’s story may be transcendent entertainment, but it is disastrous dating advice.

And, overall, I agree with the points he makes, although I think he’s a little bit too caught up with smell studies of initial attraction and not sufficiently caught up with “lasting love takes lasting work” message inherent in some of the other studies he cites.

However, am I the only one on the planet that read the play and thought Shakespeare, a creature of Elizabethan times, was writing about two impetuous teenagers driven by ideals of courtly love and hormones that ruin their own lives and everyone else’s, and not about how love should be? If the play “skews” upon re-examining current Western notions of romantic love, maybe that’s not because the story is being turned on its head- but because we are now able to see the author’s original intent, from a culture that had a very different notion of relationships than Hallmark.

VD

February 14, 2010 - 5:11 pm Comments Off

Go to Jared, Kay, or DeBeers if you want to. If you want to. And more importantly, if she wants you to- commercials lie and some women would rather get a game or a gun or a Dustbuster than a lump of highly organized and highly overpriced carbon. If she’s into that sort of thing, well, some of us will pay a lot for shiny. Go to the nearest car catalogue and you’ll get the male version.

Get flowers, or chocolate, or don’t. Does that turn her or you on? Not? Groovy.

Do something surprising and romantic, or do something completely expected that you both know you enjoy.

Key point: that you will both enjoy. If you’re coupled up, be that any arrangement or number of genders, then go connect and be good to each other for the day. If not, find a friend likewise unattached and be good to them for the day.

Just because Hallmark is going to make money off it doesn’t make it evil. But don’t buy those Russel Stovers’ boxes of candies. Those things are made with Fail Filling.

Good? Good.

QotD

February 12, 2010 - 3:27 pm Comments Off

You don’t use science to show that you’re right, you use science to become right.

Cooking Noob: Dirty Rice Dressing

February 11, 2010 - 7:24 pm Comments Off

Awhile back, I asked my mother for some of the recipes she made when I was younger; she CAN cook, but didn’t much care to for just two people after my father left, and I wanted to make sure that some of the things she used to make would be preserved. Having done so, I promptly filed the recipes and largely left them alone, not because I didn’t want to eat any of them, but due to a combination of my not being such a great cook myself and the most doable of them relying on an ingredient I can’t get. (Fresh shell-on shrimp.)

Now that I’m making a project out of improving my own skills, it makes sense to revisit these recipes. I picked one that Mom always made for holiday dinners like Thanksgiving and Christmas; it was a surprise to me to discover that not only do most American families not eat dirty rice on holidays, it’s actually highly specific to the central Louisiana region Mom grew up in. I didn’t think much of it as a kid, but then my palate was pretty limited at the time to “things that taste much like things I eat regularly”, as it tends to be with kids. So I decided to dust off the recipe and have a crack at it.

Transcribed from Mom’s notes, the recipe:

Tish’s Dirty Rice Dressing

1 container chicken livers (8-10 livers)
1/2 lb hot, ground sausage
1 large onion, minced
1/2 large bell pepper, minced
1 tsp celery seeds
2 cloves garlic, minced
1/4 tsp red pepper (optional)
1-2 tsps salt
1/2 tsp dried thyme
2 cups uncooked brown rice
1/4 cup chopped parsley

Boil livers until done. Remove livers and set aside to cool. Add to the remaining liquid enough water to make 2.5 cups of stock. Add the rice, bring to a boil, and then simmer covered for half an hour. Meanwhile, pan-fry the sausage until brown, breaking it into small pieces. Stir fry the onion, garlic, bell pepper, and celery seeds for 7 minutes. Chop the livers finely and add them and all remaining ingredients to the rice and cook on low for 6-7 minutes. Add salt and pepper to taste. It should be mildly spicy and very salty. Cover and refrigerate 12-24 hours to let the seasonings blend and mellow. Heat at 350 degrees in an oven for half an hour before serving.

Looking over the ingredients, I decided to throw out the green bell pepper. I’ve managed to largely cure myself of my screaming aversion to them, and they no longer ruin a dish for me, but I’m still not fond of them in and of themselves, so out they go if I’m making this for me. I also decided that, since I’m no longer a spice-aversive little wuss, I’d swap out the small amount of red pepper (heat only) for some good New Mexican chile powder (heat and flavor). So this is now more of a New-Mex-Cajun dish. I also have no idea how many livers actually went into the dish, since all I did was buy a container of them and didn’t bother to count. On with the cooking!

1. “Cook until done”? Seriously? Time to hit Google. Search “how long to cook chicken livers”. Get lots of results regarding giving them a quick fry in bacon grease. Contemplate how good that sounds and consider drastically changing the plan. But, no; reading the recipe, we need the liquid we’re going to be boiling the chicken livers in as a rough and ready stock to cook the rice in. Google “chicken livers dirty rice” and go with a general estimate of half an hour. Write the revision into your handwritten version.

2. Marshal your cast of characters. Livers, sausage, onion, garlic, brown rice… now put Benny Hill’s “Yakety Sax” on your MP3 player while you play yet another round of Seasoning Scavenger Hunt. Naturally, your spouse will have chosen the most obscure cabinet with the most things out of your visual range to stick the celery seed, and that is of course where the chile powder always lives.

3. Ponder the direction “add to the remaining liquid enough water to make 2.5 cups of stock”. Reason that some of the liquid must boil off over the course of half an hour, and there is no practical way to measure the remaining liquid without needlessly dirtying a measuring cup. Draw up 2.5 cups of water and eyeball the water level in your chosen pot.

4. Remove your livers from the fridge. (Note: this action will cause Kitchen Bitch to dematerialize from wherever she is in the house and rematerialize in the center of the kitchen.) Carefully remove the lid and contemplate the contents. Since the directions don’t include “add the liquid” or a more frank “add a bunch of blood and dubious fluids”, use a fork to carefully transfer each of the livers from container to pot, saving the odd bits and pieces for Kitchen Bitch, who hasn’t been getting much in the way of scraps lately. Studiously eyeball the new water level. Throw the container in the outside trash where the dogs can’t get at it.

5. Turn the heat to high until you get a good boil going, then back the heat back down to medium high. Since not losing much if any water would make things easier, cover the pan and set your kitchen timer. Time to disassemble the vegetables.

6. Cut the top and bottom from your onion, then pause and stare at it for a bit. Go confirm with your spouse that there is nothing wrong with an onion whose juices run milky white instead of clear. Go back and try to put it out of your mind that it looks very much like the onion is secreting a certain fluid associated with human reproduction. Be sure to toss an eye toward the stove on your path.

7. HOLY CRAP THAT’S A LOT OF FOAMY LIVER JUICE. Back the heat down to medium from medium high and remove the cover, just in case that contributed rather than the higher heat alone.

8. Continue carefully taking apart the onion. Since the initial cuts gave you a hint that this is another weaponized onion as well as a vaguely obscene one, stand well back and go slowly with a good sharp knife. Putting this thing in the food processor would probably attract the attentions of Homeland Security. Reduce your usually frenetic onion-chopping pace to a stately one suitable for a waltz beat. Take a few breaks when your mucuous membranes get close to being overwhelmed. Transfer the onions to a bowl and wash the knife and board mostly clean of the dangerous juices.

9. Select as many garlic cloves as you damn well please and whack them with the flat side of your blade to get them out of their paper. Mince. There’s not really a lot to this process these days. By this point, given the pace imposed by the onion, your livers should be done cooking.

10. …Yuck. The foamup created a really unappealing green scum. Resolve to see if you can’t clean the livers up a bit when you chop them and transfer to a bowl, using a spider to skim off the worst of the scum, then move the livers.

11. Eyeball the pot and pour in enough water to reach what looks like the first watermark created during the first stage of cooking. Measure out two cups of rice, pour into the “stock”, and resume the high-boil-medium pattern.

12. Haul out a skillet, then grab the one-pound package of hot sausage out of the fridge. Snip off the end and squeeze at roughly the halfway point; once enough has squeezed forward of your pinching point, twist the package up to force the first half out and keep the rest firmly in. Best done over the skillet.

13. Kick the heat up to medium-high and choose an implement to break the sausage into small pieces as it cooks. Discover that using your barbecue fork, if that is your implement of choice, is only a good idea after the sausage has cooked enough not to pack firmly between the tines. Cook until everything is pretty much browned and more or less in small pieces.

14. Discover that two is an insufficient number of hands to gracefully transfer greasy bits of sausage from a greasy pan into a smallish bowl. Snap off the burner while you ponder what to do. Improvise with a balance point created by the middle spine of the kitchen sink and a towel under the handle. At least the dogs will be grateful for the strays.

15. Replace the pan on the burner and restore the heat. Dump in the onions and garlic and spread them evenly, then apply the celery seed and sautee in the fat left from the sausage. As you work on keeping everything evenly distributed, wonder in a vague sort of way why it seems like a lot longer than four minutes you observed left remaining on the timer when you put the vegetables to heat. At some point it will dawn on you that you never started a new timer for the rice, and the “four minutes and ten seconds” you saw left on the microwave display was actually the time. Fortunately, onions and garlic are one thing we do know how to “cook until done”, likewise rice. Cook the onions until soft and translucent, then remove from heat.

16. Return your attention to the livers. Since early experimentation reveals it’s going to take roughly ten years to wash each liver carefully enough to remove scum without it falling apart, reason that it’s called “dirty rice dressing” anyway and hope it isn’t noticeable. Chop the hell out of them, then scrape carefully from the cutting board into the pot of rice, which has absorbed all the stock and looks pretty well done. Stir in livers. Retrieve sausage and stir that in. Stir in vegetables.

17. Add the chile powder. This is pretty mild stuff and 1/4 tsp is a pretty wimpy amount. Add about a tablespoon and a half of pepper-and-salt mix. Add the thyme. Recall that you never did get around to buying fresh parsley because it always amounts to getting a small tree of which you will only use a few sprigs, and add some amount of dried chopped parsley between “none” and “1/4 cup”. Stir everything in again and cook another 6-7 minutes.

18. Cover the pot and pop into the refrigerator. Since you have now spent two hours cooking something you cannot eat until tomorrow, go out for sushi.

19. Discover that, due to your spouse making roast duck to go with your dressing, it is not possible to reheat in an oven at 350 because the one and only oven is occupied and is chugging along at 475. Swear. Improvise by spreading out the dressing in a layer in a baking dish and giving it a quick warmthrough while the duck is browning. Serve and consume.

This turned out “meh”, due to my mistakes rather than due to the recipe; between the lack of kitchen timer on the rice cooking, my being rushed to make a dinner reservation, and my not bothering to taste for doneness, the rice was undercooked and unpleasantly crunchy. No doubt the browning it got didn’t help either. We think we’ll try to salvage the rest (and there’s a lot of rest) by pouring in about a cup of chicken stock as it reheats the standard way next time. There’s nothing wrong with the flavor profile, however, and I can easily see myself making it again. I think next time I’d also add some green onion, and possibly some peas to replace the “green” role left unfilled by the absence of the green peppers.

*still holding*

February 10, 2010 - 6:00 pm Comments Off

So, thanks to the evening being tied up with a social obligation, the dirty rice dressing I made for Cooking Noob shall have to remain unconsumed, and the post incomplete, until tomorrow.

In the meantime, have the latest thing to tickle our funny bones: PhD Comics

*hold music*

February 9, 2010 - 8:19 pm Comments Off

Did the actual cooking for the next Cooking Noob this afternoon, for something that needs to sit for a day before the eating, then went out to dinner and consumed excellent sushi immediately afterward. Just got back.

No post for you!

…And You Expect This To Change My Mind, Why?

February 8, 2010 - 5:43 pm Comments Off

So long as I’m ranting about gender issues, I’ve noticed a very weird and somewhat annoying phenomenon over the course of my career arguing on the internet. To wit: I will be arguing about some kind of cultural issue, and a male commenter will inform me that he would never date a girl/woman who (insert trait, opinion, or habit of mine here), clearly with the intention that I will take this as a warning that I am scaring off “quality” guys (read: guys like him, the two concepts are interchangeable) and that this will somehow influence my opinions, habits, or whatever. Otherwise, there would be no reason to bring it up in a conversation that was in no way related to dating Male Commenter Sumgye.

What. The. Fuck? Why on earth do they do this? Not only am I married, and happily so, the guys in question never know if I’m young or old or even straight, because the subject at hand is never actually dating. For that matter, WHY would anyone assume announcing that he wouldn’t find me attractive because his values severely conflict with mine (or his aesthetic tastes conflict with my choice of clothing and/or body type) would actually upset or influence me in any way? Even if I WERE single and looking, he just basically announced that I therefore wouldn’t want to date him either. Even better is getting told I’m what’s wrong with “American women” and that’s why he won’t date us anymore; believe me, Mr. Mail-Order Misogynist, I’m clicking my heels for fucking joy that there is no situation in which I would ever have to deal with your interest.

I stopped caring about whether or not I had to change some aspect of myself so “boys” would like me when I was a fucking teenager. I started caring about hanging out with people that liked the way I already am and shared enough of my values that disagreements were minor and friendly, and since college I’ve never really been short of them. (Though being married to a guy I met in college has kind of restricted actually trying any others on, so to speak.) I’m hardly alone in this; the majority of women out there have managed to interact with the rest of the other half of the human race successfully enough that their choices aren’t limited to “scumbags and losers” versus “men who disapprove of her”. So why the hell does this behavior persist to the point of repeated attempts to use it as a persuasion tactic in arguments totally unrelated to finding mates? Do women do this to men too and I just haven’t been on the irritating end of it?

Does this even work as an actual pickup? “You know, if you changed some things about you, I might possibly find you sufficiently attractive to have lunch with.” OH BABY THAT’S HOT. TAKE ME NOW.

Vicious Circle, Smallest Minority Edition

February 5, 2010 - 5:33 pm Comments Off

It’s up here, and features guest star (and potential regular, we can always hope) Kevin Baker. We made an attempt to be intellectual this time. Results were mixed.

Naked

February 4, 2010 - 3:04 pm Comments Off

First, a couple of things regarding the continuing brouhaha:

1. If you argument about how we cannot possibly have openly gay servicemembers is identical in structure and rationale to arguments made in 1948 as to why we cannot racially integrate the armed forces, it will either be ignored or for my own amusement I will argue with you as though it is 1948.

2. It’s really interesting how outlook on the armed forces by civilians inverts the standard political affiliation patterns depending on the issue. If our men in arms are truly bestial creatures unable to restrain their killing rage when faced with that which they are suspicious of or unfamiliar with, or unable to restrain their urge to rape whatever looks good, then maybe the anti-war liberals have an excellent point when it comes to inflicting these people on the locals in foreign places under combat stress.

3. I will reiterate for those who are still arguing as though the issue is “we can’t have gays in military or there will be rape and murder in the showers”: we have had gay people in the military and in the showers clandestinely basically forever, officially-but-with-pretend-games for seventeen years, and openly in 23 other countries, some very much like us and and some less so. The predicted chaos and loss of effectiveness simply hasn’t happened. So far as I’m concerned it is very much akin to the “shootouts in the streets!” concealed and open carry hysteria, and you are unlikely to convince me otherwise if you just try to explain it again.

All that said, one comparison frequently brought up is women showering with straight men, soldiers or not. And it’s true, women are generally unwilling to shower with men they’re not sleeping with, and it IS different than showering with other women.

What interests me about the whole question is I spent most of yesterday mulling over the fact that it IS true I wouldn’t want to shower with a collection of strange guys, and yet at the same time it also has never bothered me even slightly to be showering or changing in front of other women who might be- or I outright KNEW to be- lesbian or bisexual. I just don’t worry that they might be looking, in fact it bothers me less than it does to have a strange guy openly staring at my chest when I’m fully clothed. It also strikes me that women in general (with notable exceptions) tend to feel less threatened by that unwanted same-sex interest than men tend to be. At first I thought it was solely because we’re far more conditioned to cope with unwanted interest in general, but I don’t think that’s entirely it, either.

I think it’s because, for a number of reasons, many men will take full or partial nudity in a woman as an invitation. Part of it is just that lovely, sick undertone in our culture that drives the “she was asking for it” defense of rape, or colors people’s perceptions of whether it was really rape or not depending on how much skin is showing. Part of it is that, unfortunately, far too often “no” actually DOES mean “try harder” and some men experience that often enough to be a tad confused when it comes to when “no” actually does mean “holy fuck go away I’m not interested”. Part of it is that there simply is no context in our culture in which men and women are nude together that is NOT explicitly sexual. Either way, any woman learns by the time she’s done with adolescence and early adulthood that if she doesn’t want to be groped or worse, she needs to set and maintain clear boundaries- which definitely do not include hopping in the shower with a guy you’d mind having sex with. I’d mind showering with a strange guy not because it would really bother me that much to have him see me naked- I figure if he’s interested I’ve probably already been naked in his imagination anyway- but because absolutely nothing in my experience prepares me to trust that he will keep his hands to himself.

We do, however, have lots of cultural context for same-gender nudity that is absent of sex. Everywhere I mentioned: school, gym, camp, and yes, the military. It’s why I stressed it in my last post: anybody who has taken a public shower or steam soak has probably done it at some point with someone who was gay or bisexual and potentially interested- and unless you’re living in a porn or had an unusual experience, nothing happened and you probably never had the slightest clue. This is because, in that context everyone is raised and trained in, you DEFINITELY do not express any form of interest. If a guy assumes a woman who is naked or mostly naked is sexually open because otherwise she has no reason to be naked, nobody assumes their shower-mates in the gym are. They also assume that if they try anyway, they’ll almost certainly be angrily rejected at best and actually beaten up at worst. It’s amazing what astounding powers of self-control the convincing threat of violent consequences impart to those who otherwise claim to have none, and I suspect this is reason number one with a bullet why rape of men is common in prison and vanishingly rare in the military.

It’s not about the possibility of attraction, it’s about gender- and the social and cultural conditioning to cope with the opposite gender and our own we all receive regardless of sexuality.

A little more flame fanning…

February 3, 2010 - 11:32 pm Comments Off

Abby hits on a note that’s been bugging me. Very worth the visit, and ties in to my take on the whole situation…

“I will not lie, cheat, or steal, nor tolerate those who do. Unless they’re queer, and then the lying is mandatory.