Archive for the ‘mushy stuff’ Category

Mind the VD

February 14, 2012 - 6:09 pm Comments Off

Happy Valentine’s/Single’s Awareness/Transactional Model of Sex day. Have some chocolate and mind the sticky stuff.

Valentine’s Day is a commercially created money generator for the candy, greeting card, flower, restaurant, and jewelry industry that locks singles and people in anything approaching a nontraditional relationship out in the cold and generally starts giving people bad memories sometime around grade school, but still. If you’re not screaming at the jewelry commercials (Men! Bribe her for sex and affection! Women! Test his memory and credit card limit!) or finding a single friend to watch anything but romantic comedies with, I genuinely wish you a fun time. As stupid and trainwrecked as the whole thing is, it’s nice to have an excuse for some close, warm time and to make your partner first priority of the day. (I kind of wish there were a Besties day for similar reason, but I kind of suspect this is actually what birthdays are for.)

We’re putting ours off, but we’ll get round to it. Not a good day for us and if we’re going to put in the effort, it’s going to be on a better day.

XKCD and Oglaf (NSFW!) summed it up pretty well. Try to avoid listening to the love skull or stapling your body parts to any other body parts, unless that’s part of a great evening for you.

No Means NO, Wayne.

May 27, 2011 - 10:38 am Comments Off

Look, I’m realistic enough to know that compared to the real 2A heros like Alan Gura and the 2nd Amendment Foundation, the NRA’s chief concern is with perpetuating the NRA, sort of like the NAACP. But at some point you gotta step back and look at your marketing. This morning in my spam filter, the NRA went from obnoxious buddy pushing their shoddy Mary Kay wine by the copy machine into… well, this:

From: Wayne LaPierre
Subj: I wrote this for you

I honestly couldn’t tell you what it has in it beyond that. The notion of Wafflin’ Wayne there personally scribing missives to lil’ ol’ me was creeptastic enough in and of itself to send visions of GLaDOS dancing through my head.

Seriously, Wayne. I just don’t like you that way. And after that? There is no fuckin’ way in hell I’m even touching any wine from you.

Update: Ok, I cowboy’d up and clicked it before deleting. It got worse.

Dear Stingray,
I’ve written a new book about safety strategies for you and your family.

Good for you, buddy. Just pay no mind to the sound of the shotgun charging, fresh mags seating, and the door being barricaded at the rally point.

What Was The Question Again?

May 18, 2011 - 5:16 pm Comments Off

I’ve only been home a day or so and am still catching up, so I don’t have much in the way of backlogged ideas for blogfodder. Mostly, I’ve been enjoying being in my own bed with my own pets with my own spouse in my own household. Phoenix is a nice city as cities go, but it’s not really “home” anymore.

That said, while surfing around at other people’s places, I ran across a question I’ve seen a lot, that seems to crop up on surveys and inane first-date interviews everywhere- “Do you believe in true love?”

What struck me as odd about the question on the eleventy-billionth reading is that I have no idea what it’s even supposed to mean. What the fuck IS “true love”, anyway?

If it’s “a deeply and sincerely felt emotional affectionate and romantic attachment”, then not only do I believe in true love, I think it’s pretty common. It can probably be differentiated somewhat from lust and infatuation, but millions of happily married and otherwise long-time couples across the face of the earth make the question somewhat trivial.

If it’s “a bond that can never be broken no matter what because love always comes through”, then that strikes me as not only a fictional thing, but still a silly question. Relationships require work, romances no exception, and if anything it’s much easier to hurt the other person and damage or destroy the relationship when you are so intimate that you know all the vulnerable points that can be hit. I’d chalk this up to the difference between fantasy and reality, but what makes the question really bizarre is that this is exactly what the fantasies are ABOUT- every single love story isn’t about two people forgiving each other for anything and effortlessly getting along with each other, they’re about conflict and misunderstanding and going to lengths to demonstrate one’s dedication.

The underlying question- and the one that gets our attention again and again- is always “will the bond survive the pressures on it”, and what the pressures are depends on the setting, culture, and the sophistication of the fantasy; immature and youthful fantasies tend to rely mostly on very dramatic outside pressures (RIVAL CLAN OF VAMPIRES!), but still tend to feature stupid misunderstandings and other user-generated errors. More mature ones tend to focus on pressures like a job that takes all of one person’s time, monomanias, and the sheer passage of time and lessening of newness, but even in fiction “and so they were incredibly attracted to each other and thus they stayed together forever” never makes the cut. Love stories often continue to qualify as such when external pressures keep a couple apart, and are certainly not an unfavored genre.

So if it’s not love as most of us experience it (note we rarely witter on about “true sadness”, or “true amusement”), and it’s not “romances that don’t require work”, nor is it “romances foreordained to end happily”, what the hell is it supposed to BE?

The world needs an answer to this. We have surveys to fill out.

Tattoo Day Boogaloo

March 26, 2010 - 9:59 pm Comments Off

Finally found where my artist relocated to. He had my e-mail address typoed. Lulz.

So, in classic fashion, I’m zonked out on spent adrenaline, Stingray is zonked out on lack of sleep, and we’re both zonked out on having to beat back both of these to make raid time. No more tattoo days and raid nights on the same day.

Random thought of the day: In romances, romantic comedies, and soft touches in genres of all kinds, a kiss to your sleeping partner is a sweet and gentle way to wake them up.

So am I the only one who wakes up flailing in a panic because something touched their face while they were sound asleep? I mean, I think it’s sweet AFTER I’ve taken a swipe at his head and apologized for it…

VD

February 14, 2010 - 5:11 pm Comments Off

Go to Jared, Kay, or DeBeers if you want to. If you want to. And more importantly, if she wants you to- commercials lie and some women would rather get a game or a gun or a Dustbuster than a lump of highly organized and highly overpriced carbon. If she’s into that sort of thing, well, some of us will pay a lot for shiny. Go to the nearest car catalogue and you’ll get the male version.

Get flowers, or chocolate, or don’t. Does that turn her or you on? Not? Groovy.

Do something surprising and romantic, or do something completely expected that you both know you enjoy.

Key point: that you will both enjoy. If you’re coupled up, be that any arrangement or number of genders, then go connect and be good to each other for the day. If not, find a friend likewise unattached and be good to them for the day.

Just because Hallmark is going to make money off it doesn’t make it evil. But don’t buy those Russel Stovers’ boxes of candies. Those things are made with Fail Filling.

Good? Good.

gg + Bg 4ever

September 9, 2009 - 11:12 am Comments Off

Today’s XKCD:

It would have been fun, though.

Have I ever done this? No; I only ever dated geeks, but my record consists of math, physics, engineering, and computer geeks rather than my own subspecies. Call it negative assortative mating. However, I DID do this when feeling lovesick the way other girls apparently liked to write their initials and his, or their name with his last; the only difference is MY notebook scribblings were completely undecipherable to an outsider, except as biology homework.

(Should we change our minds and choose to reproduce, the kid will definitely be fair-skinned and brown-haired, and likely have green or hazel eyes, though not knowing more of his relatives there’s a chance I can’t calculate for blue.)

Suggestions Also Welcome In Comments

June 4, 2009 - 4:06 pm Comments Off

Today is my anniversary, celebrating five years of marriage and ten years since meeting the man I want to spend the rest of my life with in the flesh. Yes, they are the same day. Yes, this was deliberate. It was Stingray’s idea, too- as I’ve mentioned before, he actually well outpaces me in the field of thoughtful, romantic little touches like that. I usually reserve Valentine’s day to comment on my most valued relationship, and as I’m having one of those periods where my brain apparently walked out on me without so much as a bitchy answering machine message, I’m not coming up with anything particularly new or insightful to wax on about except that I’m still in love and plan to spend the rest of my day celebrating that. We’re going out to eat, then there will be cuddling and movie, and then it’s none of your business.

So, since meaty content will not be forthcoming unless something highly bloggable drops out of the sky and into my lap, I’m going to test out our polling widget with regards to my ongoing cooking project.

[poll id=”3″]

Edit: Grrrrr, the damn poll appears to be broken, at least it is on this end. Don’t have time to fix it now. Vote in comments.

Stuff I've Learned

February 14, 2009 - 3:07 pm Comments Off

So last year I posted my thoughts on Valentine’s day and more specifically about the person I’ve shared it with for the last… *counts*… ten years or so and why he makes me chipper at the prospect of a day dedicated to appreciating what I have there. Given that I’m nothing if not appreciative for a date that gives me an easy subject to blog about, I figured I’d cover what I’ve learned in those years that I’m pretty sure are part of the reason I’ve still got it.

1. The best girl friend in the world isn’t the one that will always and inevitably take your side 100% when you have a fight with your man, it’s the one that likes him and will remind you of why you do, too, and where he was probably coming from during the fight. Not tell you you were wrong if you weren’t or that he didn’t behave badly if he did- but WILL tell you you’re wrong if you are. Friends like this are invaluable and should be told as much.

2. Speaking of fights, during them there will inevitably come an opening where you can see clear as day your partner’s weakness most exposed and exactly how you can strike at it to shut them down completely and emerge with total victory in your hands. Resist the temptation to do so at all costs, even if it means letting them be “right” until a more rational discussion can be had later. If you are angry enough to succumb to that tempation, a groveling apology is in order in the aftermath. No exceptions.

3. If you’re fighting about the same things over and over, you have a problem that needs addressing in a non-fight context. If you’re fighting about things that seem gobsmackingly stupid in hindsight, as long as it’s not a frequent occurrence, this is actually not something to worry about- it probably just means the stupid subject was what you happened to fight about when you were both tired, stressed, and pissed off about things you had no ability to rail at when your partner was much more available. Fights are as inevitable in any long-term relationship as rain is even in the desert; be glad you didn’t have anything more consequential to spat over. True fact: we once had a sleeping-on-the-couch blowout that started over the odds whether the universe as we know it should exist.

4. While it’s true that you really can’t change somebody’s personality, the worst expressions of it can be mitigated, if they want to make some effort. A disorganized and mess-tolerant person will never become a neatnik, but an acceptable middle ground can be met. As ever, the rule is that if you care deeply about something and your partner really doesn’t, you can expect some concession from them to keep you from going crazy, but you can never fairly expect them to act as though they care every bit as much as you do.

5. Saying something bothers you is not just OK, but necessary unless you want it to come frothing up and surprise the living hell out of your partner, who will then immediately lash back. Pick a diplomatic time and place to bring it up. When your partner is feeling on top of or crushed under the boot of the world is not it. Nagging is never OK- let them know you want something or that something bothers you, but if they know that and are still not doing it or still not stopping, then constantly reminding them won’t help to do anything but strengthen their passive-aggressive resolve.

6. If you wouldn’t say something about a dear and beloved friend to another friend behind their back, do not EVER do this to your spouse. Embarassing stories are not cool unless they’re already telling the same story themselves. Ranting at your friends about them every time they piss you off but never mentioning the times they thrilled you will never, ever lead to a good situation. Your friends’ two prime roles are support and a reality barometer- never undermine the latter to pump the former. Ranting about the opposite sex in general isn’t cool either, unless you’re either homosexual or in a relationship with an undisclosed third sex.

7. Speaking of when they thrilled you, if you find yourself having a warm and fuzzy feeling just looking at them, now is a good time for a no-reason kiss or hug and you saying so. If you appreciate something they did, say so. If they look good in what they’re wearing or what they’re doing, say so. If they handled something in a way that impressed you, say so. This is a very easy habit to get into and does a powerful amount of good. Exception: when it would break their concentration- then you wait till they’re done. If you’re impressed by your partner’s arc-welding skills and feel they look damn sexy doing it… wait until they’re done to disclose this.

8. If you’re in a bad situation that’s your partner’s fault and he or she knows damn good and well it’s their fault, that is NOT the time to say “I told you so” or anything that could be mistaken for it. They KNOW you told them so and don’t need the reminder, if they’re any sort of decent they feel bad enough already. Keep your mouth mostly shut except for any constructive and neutral input on how to get out of or mitigate your current situation. “Lessons learned” is for when you’re home, showered, fed, and slept.

9. While sex drives almost never match completely and sometimes are drastically mismatched, it’s a myth that only men experience sex as intimacy in a relationship and need it to keep that going. If you don’t feel like having sex with your partner, waiting months until you magically do will not work. You have another problem. Find it.

10. Talking about a problem you have, no matter how stupid you think it is or how badly you think the other person will react, is never EVER half as bad as not talking eventually will be.

And lastly… if you’re both pretty convinced you got real lucky and maybe don’t entirely deserve what you have… then that might be a good sign for the future of your relationship, as long as you’re simply grateful instead of insecure.

(Yeah, I know. This is all pretty basic. As with any life activity, the basics are the most important bit and will cause you to fail the hardest when you neglect them, yes?)

To remove sap, use turpentine

February 14, 2008 - 4:19 pm Comments Off

It’s that time of year again. Time for high expectations, the most obnoxious commercials on television, nauseating packs of Russel Stover’s, stuffed animals toting gut-wrenching puns, and if we’re lucky, History Channel specials on gangland massacres.

A lot of people hate the hell out of Valentine’s day. They point out- and they are absolutely correct- that it’s a completely artificial and commercial creation designed to milk the bucks out of couples looking to prove something for food, booze, candy, cards, flowers, and jewelry. They point out that it makes single people feel like shit for being single. They point out that it puts a big ol’ anxiety hammer on couples, especially those who haven’t been together too long, to suddenly become psychic in order to figure out what their partner’s expected level of acknowledgement is. And, of course, it creates a great big land mine for anyone with a tendency to date-related absent-mindedness that can lead to tears, rage, and bad backs from sleeping on the couch. All of these things are true.

All the same though, I can’t really work up a hate-on for Valentine’s day. The truth is that I like getting a little extra romantic affection, even if it’s not out of the blue. So what if it’s not? I don’t see a damn thing wrong with setting a predictable date for a ritual acknowledgement of something important- be it your mother, your significant other, or even yourself. It gives people time to prepare and an assurance that you’re going to be on the same page, instead of one of you thinking they’re going to spend the day off somewhere else working or indulging in a hobby. If it’s an empty gesture? Then yes, that’s a problem, but just because it’s scheduled doesn’t mean it has to be empty- if it’s empty, you’ve got another problem that’s absolutely not Hallmark’s fault.

Rachel has managed to tap into a vein of rage on the expectations some people have of men plunking down ridiculous sums of money for what amounts to a woman-mounted shiny object in order to “prove” his love or his status or what the hell ever. Watching even one of this season’s commercials from Jared or Kay or DeBeers makes me feel pretty much the same way- especially the slogan “Every Kiss Begins With Kay”, which takes the whole “sex for jewelry” implied message present in all of them and amplifies it into even the smallest gesture of affection being rooted in the regular supply of shinies. (I’ve always been rather puzzled about the whole sex-for-jewelry message anyway. Honey, if you need precious metals and gems to get excited enough about him to have enthusiastic sex with him, why are you with him?) I’d be a hypocrite if I sneered at the idea of a gift being expensive but worthless except aesthetically- with me, it’s paintings- but it’s not that that bothers me, it’s the idea some people have in their heads (and these commercials exploit) that diamonds and other jewelry are some sort of universal currency exchange that equate in direct dollar values to love and devotion. The message: if you ply her with the magic rock, she’ll come instantly unglued at the knees and adore you. Sure, it’s expensive, but it’s a can’t-lose proposition!

I don’t wear jewelry that’s not permanently attached. If Stingray brought me home a diamond tennis bracelet, or a big rock onna ring, I would definitely have an overwhelming reaction: I’d be pissed off. That would be saying- with a big waste of our money- that he didn’t know me, he didn’t care to try, and that he thought I was both stupid and could be bought. Give me a diamond- sleep on the couch.

But, the thing is- and the reason I enjoy Valentine’s day despite the mountain of bullshit served alongside- is that he does know me. He’s blunt, cynical, can be rude, can be very crude, would never win a prize for slick charm or qualify as a screen heartthrob, but he knows me very goddamn well. When I was a college student, I found a first-edition copy of Alfred Kinsey’s Sexual Behavior of the Human Male in a used bookstore. I put it back on the shelf because at the time I was often living mostly on Ramen and Wonder Bread and couldn’t quite justify the price to myself, but I always regretted the missed opportunity. I mentioned this, in passing, probably while we were both several beers in, to Stingray. Once. Much later, when I was having an epically shitty day, he surprised me with a first-ed of not only Human Male, but Human Female as well. My reaction was roughly on par with what DeBeers seems to think it should be to several-carat finger-mounted monstrosity. It wasn’t a terribly expensive gift, but it was one that said he knows exactly the kinds of things that I treasure- and cares enough to make it a priority for himself, too. Needless to say, my lousy day was instantly and completely redeemed into a very happy evening.

It wasn’t a one-shot deal, either. When my father died, my stepmother, who is the sort of stepmother that would feel right at home in a German fairy tale, took the opportunity to hurt me in as many ways as she could. Tying up the estate and leaving it in limbo for years was easy enough for her, but that didn’t hurt so much as aggravate since we weren’t hurting for the money much. The other thing she could do- make sure I never got my hands on any possession of his that would have any sentimental meaning to me- that did hurt. In particular, the loss of the comic book collection we spent most of my adolescence building together- one of the few things we could bond over during an otherwise tense time- was painful. We liked a lot of obscure and independent titles that other comic book collectors didn’t, so I never could find most of them when I looked through the stuff that comic shops kept on hand. I wrote it off as lost. Once again, a few months after I mentioned this (once, in passing), I found a good-sized chunk of the lost collection- not the originals, but books he’d somehow found through an obscure comics-collector service- sitting on the coffee table. No occasion, he just knew it would make me happy.

That’s romance. It’s the reason I wouldn’t feel anything other than mild disappointment if he DID forget Valentine’s Day or any other of the calendar-set occasions. But, perhaps naturally, he never does- although I’m prone to it. (Embarrassingly, I’m not half as good at this stuff as he is.)
In the meantime, we’ll be, yes, going out to dinner. He loves fine food, I love fine food, it will make us both happy- and the place we’ve picked is downright designed to feel intimate even if it’s at full capacity.

There’s nothing left to prove.

Right now I just want to know the root of "Storge"- Google is my next stop

November 11, 2007 - 2:01 pm Comments Off

Via the comments at The Pervocracy*, purported love styles. I haven’t read the rest of the site (though I intend to), but this made a lot of sense to me. Love as I experience it doesn’t feel ANYTHING like what people in romantic movies and stories go through, and I always kind of felt like a robot for it. (Or, in my less charitable moments, that other people were totally fucking insane and putting themselves through a lot of needless crap.) I think this is me:

Storge – some people experience love as a gradual and slow process. When love is based on Storge, getting to know someone comes before having intense feelings for that person. Love based on Storge takes time, it requires genuine liking and understanding of a partner, and it develops slowly over time. Love based on Storge is often compared to the love that one has for a friend. In fact, people who experience love as Storge often fall in love with their friends.

Yeah. It explains why “love at first sight” is a totally and completely alien concept to me, why I don’t get “star-crossed lovers”, and why the hardest thing about maturing in this department for me was learning the subtler differences between love and friendship. (And why all the stupid, regrettable drama in my past love life came from falling for friends or having them fall for me.) I don’t know how accurate these categories are, but it makes the different ways I see “love” being used make SO MUCH MORE SENSE.

*Latest addition to the blogroll. As the title suggests, it is very Not Safe For Work and probably not so great if you hate internet TMI, but if a combination of pragmatic self-reflection and erotica sounds like chocolate in your peanut butter, go give ‘er a read.

ETA: More God, faith, and spirituality stuff IS coming, but the more my day goes on the more I think I need a break. Wanting to drop the Theodore Dalrymple I’m reading and go get a Stephen King or a Terry Pratchett is a pretty good sign I’m stripping my gears.